Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the appellant, being a domain name registrar, does not own the domain names it helps register and cannot confer the right to use or transfer such domain names. Therefore, the income earned from domain name registration services is not taxable as royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) of the Act and Article 12(3)(a) of the India-USA DTAA. The ITAT affirmed the Delhi HC's decision in the appellant's own case for earlier years. Regarding treaty benefits, the ITAT held that the appellant, being an LLP, is eligible for benefits under the DTAA, relying on precedents. The income from non-domain services like web hosting and web designing does not involve transfer of technical knowledge or know-how and hence cannot be taxed as fees for included services under Article 12(4)(b) of the DTAA.
The ITAT held that the appellant, being a domain name registrar, does not own the domain names it helps register and cannot confer the right to use or transfer such domain names. Therefore, the income earned from domain name registration services is not taxable as royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) of the Act and Article 12(3)(a) of the India-USA DTAA. The ITAT affirmed the Delhi HC's decision in the appellant's own case for earlier years. Regarding treaty benefits, the ITAT held that the appellant, being an LLP, is eligible for benefits under the DTAA, relying on precedents. The income from non-domain services like web hosting and web designing does not involve transfer of technical knowledge or know-how and hence cannot be taxed as fees for included services under Article 12(4)(b) of the DTAA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.