Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Appellant provided services of loading, unloading, shifting, and transportation of iron ore under separate contracts. CESTAT held it was a composite service for transportation, not cargo handling. Loading/unloading activities were incidental, contract couldn't be artificially divided. For 2010-11 to 2011-12, goods were exported, so demand set aside. For extended period, demand time-barred as no suppression of facts by appellant who believed no service tax payable. Appeal allowed, demand unsustainable.
Appellant provided services of loading, unloading, shifting, and transportation of iron ore under separate contracts. CESTAT held it was a composite service for transportation, not cargo handling. Loading/unloading activities were incidental, contract couldn't be artificially divided. For 2010-11 to 2011-12, goods were exported, so demand set aside. For extended period, demand time-barred as no suppression of facts by appellant who believed no service tax payable. Appeal allowed, demand unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
