PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The appellant had reversed CENVAT credit amount u/r 6(3) for goods cleared for export under Notification No. 4/2006-CE and claimed refund. CESTAT held that reversal u/r 6(3) was not justified for exports under conditional Notification No. 4/2006-CE as per Rule 6(6)(v). The exempted goods cleared for export are eligible for CENVAT credit. The appellant is not required to pay amount u/r 6(3) for goods exported under said notification. Impugned order set aside and appeal allowed.
The appellant had reversed CENVAT credit amount u/r 6(3) for goods cleared for export under Notification No. 4/2006-CE and claimed refund. CESTAT held that reversal u/r 6(3) was not justified for exports under conditional Notification No. 4/2006-CE as per Rule 6(6)(v). The exempted goods cleared for export are eligible for CENVAT credit. The appellant is not required to pay amount u/r 6(3) for goods exported under said notification. Impugned order set aside and appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
