Functional comparability governs selection of support-service and IT-enabled service comparables, with verification required for unresolved data and m...
Bank account freezing requires statutory authority; anti-money-laundering compliance and KYC monitoring do not permit unilateral indefinite restrictio...
The appellant had reversed CENVAT credit amount u/r 6(3) for goods cleared for export under Notification No. 4/2006-CE and claimed refund. CESTAT held that reversal u/r 6(3) was not justified for exports under conditional Notification No. 4/2006-CE as per Rule 6(6)(v). The exempted goods cleared for export are eligible for CENVAT credit. The appellant is not required to pay amount u/r 6(3) for goods exported under said notification. Impugned order set aside and appeal allowed.
The appellant had reversed CENVAT credit amount u/r 6(3) for goods cleared for export under Notification No. 4/2006-CE and claimed refund. CESTAT held that reversal u/r 6(3) was not justified for exports under conditional Notification No. 4/2006-CE as per Rule 6(6)(v). The exempted goods cleared for export are eligible for CENVAT credit. The appellant is not required to pay amount u/r 6(3) for goods exported under said notification. Impugned order set aside and appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
