Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The HC upheld the order of the Revisional Court, declining to quash the complaint u/ss 138/141 of the NI Act against the petitioners, who were partners of the accused-firm. While the petitioners could not be held liable for cheques issued by a partner in personal capacity, they were rightly made accused for cheques issued by the partner on behalf of the firm. The HC found no reason to exercise inherent powers u/s 482 of the Code to quash the proceedings.
The HC upheld the order of the Revisional Court, declining to quash the complaint u/ss 138/141 of the NI Act against the petitioners, who were partners of the accused-firm. While the petitioners could not be held liable for cheques issued by a partner in personal capacity, they were rightly made accused for cheques issued by the partner on behalf of the firm. The HC found no reason to exercise inherent powers u/s 482 of the Code to quash the proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
