Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC held that the respondent no. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay the petitioner the difference in GST amount at 6% from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which interest at 6% per annum shall be payable from the date of entitlement, as the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18% during this period according to respondent no. 4, the state GST department. The petition was disposed of.
The HC held that the respondent no. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay the petitioner the difference in GST amount at 6% from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which interest at 6% per annum shall be payable from the date of entitlement, as the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18% during this period according to respondent no. 4, the state GST department. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
