Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The HC held that the respondent no. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay the petitioner the difference in GST amount at 6% from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which interest at 6% per annum shall be payable from the date of entitlement, as the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18% during this period according to respondent no. 4, the state GST department. The petition was disposed of.
The HC held that the respondent no. 2, a government entity, is liable to pay the petitioner the difference in GST amount at 6% from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 within three months, failing which interest at 6% per annum shall be payable from the date of entitlement, as the GST rate was enhanced from 12% to 18% during this period according to respondent no. 4, the state GST department. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
