Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Refund due to inverted rate of duty structure: HC disposed of the petition allowing the petitioner-Firm to file a fresh refund application for services covered by the retrospective amendment to Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules 2017. The respondents were directed to decide the application strictly per the amended rule and applicable laws, requiring them to operate the GST portal accordingly.
Refund due to inverted rate of duty structure: HC disposed of the petition allowing the petitioner-Firm to file a fresh refund application for services covered by the retrospective amendment to Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules 2017. The respondents were directed to decide the application strictly per the amended rule and applicable laws, requiring them to operate the GST portal accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
