Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
The AAAR held that for construction services, the time of supply for GST purposes is the date of receipt of mobilization advance, being the earliest of the date of issue of invoice or receipt of payment. The mobilization advance constitutes payment and consideration, despite appellant's contention that it is merely a transaction in money. The notification No. 66/2017-CT (Rate) is inapplicable as the supply pertains to services. Consequently, the appeal by M/s S.P. Singla Constructions P Ltd. was rejected.
The AAAR held that for construction services, the time of supply for GST purposes is the date of receipt of mobilization advance, being the earliest of the date of issue of invoice or receipt of payment. The mobilization advance constitutes payment and consideration, despite appellant's contention that it is merely a transaction in money. The notification No. 66/2017-CT (Rate) is inapplicable as the supply pertains to services. Consequently, the appeal by M/s S.P. Singla Constructions P Ltd. was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
