Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AAAR held that for construction services, the time of supply for GST purposes is the date of receipt of mobilization advance, being the earliest of the date of issue of invoice or receipt of payment. The mobilization advance constitutes payment and consideration, despite appellant's contention that it is merely a transaction in money. The notification No. 66/2017-CT (Rate) is inapplicable as the supply pertains to services. Consequently, the appeal by M/s S.P. Singla Constructions P Ltd. was rejected.
The AAAR held that for construction services, the time of supply for GST purposes is the date of receipt of mobilization advance, being the earliest of the date of issue of invoice or receipt of payment. The mobilization advance constitutes payment and consideration, despite appellant's contention that it is merely a transaction in money. The notification No. 66/2017-CT (Rate) is inapplicable as the supply pertains to services. Consequently, the appeal by M/s S.P. Singla Constructions P Ltd. was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
