Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Respondent failed to reduce, re-fix and display MRPS commensurately after GST rate reduction on impacted SKUs w.e.f. 15.11.2017 and convey the same to dealers, thereby not passing on tax reduction benefit to consumers in violation of Section 171 of GST Act as per Delhi HC judgment [2024 (1) TMI 1248]. DGAP report stating no violation cannot be accepted. DGAP directed to reinvestigate case as per HC judgment and submit report u/r 133(4) of CGST Rules, 2017.
Respondent failed to reduce, re-fix and display MRPS commensurately after GST rate reduction on impacted SKUs w.e.f. 15.11.2017 and convey the same to dealers, thereby not passing on tax reduction benefit to consumers in violation of Section 171 of GST Act as per Delhi HC judgment [2024 (1) TMI 1248]. DGAP report stating no violation cannot be accepted. DGAP directed to reinvestigate case as per HC judgment and submit report u/r 133(4) of CGST Rules, 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
