Reassessment disclosure requirements permit stated reasons without revealing information sources, but prior-taxation claims require full examination b...
Independent assessment discretion and corroborated electronic evidence determine validity of on-money additions and undisclosed-consideration assessme...
Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
DRI officers have jurisdiction to issue show cause notice u/s 28 of Customs Act, 1962. Appellant purchased smuggled bike registered with fake documents for Rs. 5,70,000 despite market price over Rs. 13 lakhs, making him not a bonafide purchaser. As per Section 125(1), when owner is unknown, possessor is liable to pay duty. Since bike's owner is unknown and appellant is possessor, he is liable to pay duty. Appeal dismissed by CESTAT.
DRI officers have jurisdiction to issue show cause notice u/s 28 of Customs Act, 1962. Appellant purchased smuggled bike registered with fake documents for Rs. 5,70,000 despite market price over Rs. 13 lakhs, making him not a bonafide purchaser. As per Section 125(1), when owner is unknown, possessor is liable to pay duty. Since bike's owner is unknown and appellant is possessor, he is liable to pay duty. Appeal dismissed by CESTAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
