Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Appellant imported automotive windshields. Investigation revealed parallel invoices - one with actual higher valuation and another with suppressed lower valuation presented to customs for assessment to evade duty. Declared transaction value rejected as per CVR 2007 Rule 12. Undervaluation and misdeclaration established. Goods liable for confiscation u/s 111(m). Penalties u/ss 114(A) and 114(AA) upheld. No violation of natural justice. CESTAT dismissed appeal.
Appellant imported automotive windshields. Investigation revealed parallel invoices - one with actual higher valuation and another with suppressed lower valuation presented to customs for assessment to evade duty. Declared transaction value rejected as per CVR 2007 Rule 12. Undervaluation and misdeclaration established. Goods liable for confiscation u/s 111(m). Penalties u/ss 114(A) and 114(AA) upheld. No violation of natural justice. CESTAT dismissed appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.