Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Appellant imported automotive windshields. Investigation revealed parallel invoices - one with actual higher valuation and another with suppressed lower valuation presented to customs for assessment to evade duty. Declared transaction value rejected as per CVR 2007 Rule 12. Undervaluation and misdeclaration established. Goods liable for confiscation u/s 111(m). Penalties u/ss 114(A) and 114(AA) upheld. No violation of natural justice. CESTAT dismissed appeal.
Appellant imported automotive windshields. Investigation revealed parallel invoices - one with actual higher valuation and another with suppressed lower valuation presented to customs for assessment to evade duty. Declared transaction value rejected as per CVR 2007 Rule 12. Undervaluation and misdeclaration established. Goods liable for confiscation u/s 111(m). Penalties u/ss 114(A) and 114(AA) upheld. No violation of natural justice. CESTAT dismissed appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
