Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC held that the High Court erred in exercising power of judicial review and interdicting the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) culminating in approval of a resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors. The jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority u/s 60(5)(c) was reiterated. The CIRP proceedings commenced six years ago, and the resolution plan was approved four years back, emphasizing the importance of concluding CIRP expeditiously. Unjustified interference with IBC proceedings breaches the discipline of law. The High Court erred in entertaining the writ petition due to delay and laches, especially when the respondent initiated proceedings under the IBC seeking similar relief. The IBC is a complete code with sufficient checks, balances, and remedies. Adherence to protocols and procedures maintains legal discipline. While High Courts' supervisory and judicial review powers are critical constitutional safeguards, their exercise demands rigorous scrutiny and judicious application. The appeal was allowed.
The SC held that the High Court erred in exercising power of judicial review and interdicting the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) culminating in approval of a resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors. The jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority u/s 60(5)(c) was reiterated. The CIRP proceedings commenced six years ago, and the resolution plan was approved four years back, emphasizing the importance of concluding CIRP expeditiously. Unjustified interference with IBC proceedings breaches the discipline of law. The High Court erred in entertaining the writ petition due to delay and laches, especially when the respondent initiated proceedings under the IBC seeking similar relief. The IBC is a complete code with sufficient checks, balances, and remedies. Adherence to protocols and procedures maintains legal discipline. While High Courts' supervisory and judicial review powers are critical constitutional safeguards, their exercise demands rigorous scrutiny and judicious application. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
