Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT held that after initiation of moratorium u/s 14(1) of the IBC, no assessment proceedings can be continued by the EPFO. However, after an order of liquidation is passed, Section 33(5) does not prohibit initiation or continuation of assessment proceedings. No claim based on assessment carried out during the moratorium period, prohibited u/s 14(1), can be admitted in CIRP. Claims filed by the appellants subsequent to approval of the Resolution Plan by the CoC could not have been admitted in CIRP as they were hit by Section 14(1). The appeals were dismissed as no error was found in the impugned orders of the Adjudicating Authority.
The NCLAT held that after initiation of moratorium u/s 14(1) of the IBC, no assessment proceedings can be continued by the EPFO. However, after an order of liquidation is passed, Section 33(5) does not prohibit initiation or continuation of assessment proceedings. No claim based on assessment carried out during the moratorium period, prohibited u/s 14(1), can be admitted in CIRP. Claims filed by the appellants subsequent to approval of the Resolution Plan by the CoC could not have been admitted in CIRP as they were hit by Section 14(1). The appeals were dismissed as no error was found in the impugned orders of the Adjudicating Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
