Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that as per the proviso to Section 281, if the transfer is made for adequate consideration and without notice of the tax dues or pending proceedings by the Income Tax Department, the transfer cannot be deemed void. The petitioners had purchased the property through a court auction for adequate consideration, without knowledge of the tax proceedings against the previous owner. The attachment by the Income Tax Department was on a larger extent, while the petitioners purchased only a portion. Relying on precedent, the HC ruled that the petitioners' claim should be allowed, and the Income Tax Department cannot proceed against the bona fide purchasers.
The HC held that as per the proviso to Section 281, if the transfer is made for adequate consideration and without notice of the tax dues or pending proceedings by the Income Tax Department, the transfer cannot be deemed void. The petitioners had purchased the property through a court auction for adequate consideration, without knowledge of the tax proceedings against the previous owner. The attachment by the Income Tax Department was on a larger extent, while the petitioners purchased only a portion. Relying on precedent, the HC ruled that the petitioners' claim should be allowed, and the Income Tax Department cannot proceed against the bona fide purchasers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
