Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the addition made by the AO u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE is unjustified. The assessee, an authorized dealer of TVS Motor Co. Pvt. Ltd., had duly recorded the cash sales in its books, and the alleged cash deposits were from the available cash in hand maintained in the regular books of accounts. The books were not rejected, and quantitative details were maintained. In the absence of evidence of any unrecorded sales and considering the assessee's dealership with a reputed company, the ITAT concluded that the assessee successfully explained the source of cash deposits during the demonetization period as arising from regular cash sales. Consequently, the impugned addition was deleted.
The ITAT held that the addition made by the AO u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE is unjustified. The assessee, an authorized dealer of TVS Motor Co. Pvt. Ltd., had duly recorded the cash sales in its books, and the alleged cash deposits were from the available cash in hand maintained in the regular books of accounts. The books were not rejected, and quantitative details were maintained. In the absence of evidence of any unrecorded sales and considering the assessee's dealership with a reputed company, the ITAT concluded that the assessee successfully explained the source of cash deposits during the demonetization period as arising from regular cash sales. Consequently, the impugned addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.