Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's quantum appeal. It upheld the CIT(A)'s finding that the unexplained cash found during search was part of the income surrendered by the assessee u/s 132(4), based on the statement recorded. Regarding the penalty u/s 271AAB(1)(a), the ITAT deleted it on technical grounds, as the penalty notice did not specify clear charges against the assessee for not fulfilling the conditions and not divulging the source of income, violating natural justice principles.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's quantum appeal. It upheld the CIT(A)'s finding that the unexplained cash found during search was part of the income surrendered by the assessee u/s 132(4), based on the statement recorded. Regarding the penalty u/s 271AAB(1)(a), the ITAT deleted it on technical grounds, as the penalty notice did not specify clear charges against the assessee for not fulfilling the conditions and not divulging the source of income, violating natural justice principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.