Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. HC held Section 61(2) requires consideration of explanation furnished. Section 61(3) states if no satisfactory explanation is given, proper officer may initiate action u/s 73. Initiation of proceeding u/s 73 was without jurisdiction. Impugned order quashed. Petitioner's reply dated 29.07.2021 to be dealt with u/s 61, thereafter revenue can proceed.
Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. HC held Section 61(2) requires consideration of explanation furnished. Section 61(3) states if no satisfactory explanation is given, proper officer may initiate action u/s 73. Initiation of proceeding u/s 73 was without jurisdiction. Impugned order quashed. Petitioner's reply dated 29.07.2021 to be dealt with u/s 61, thereafter revenue can proceed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
