Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the petitioners' chewing tobacco products are to be classified under Heading 2403 99 10 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, attracting a higher compensation cess of 160% under the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017. The petitioners cannot change the classification merely for rate benefit. The Advance Rulings classifying the products under 2403 99 10 are binding. The food safety regulations do not impact the GST classification. The petition was dismissed.
The HC held that the petitioners' chewing tobacco products are to be classified under Heading 2403 99 10 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, attracting a higher compensation cess of 160% under the GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017. The petitioners cannot change the classification merely for rate benefit. The Advance Rulings classifying the products under 2403 99 10 are binding. The food safety regulations do not impact the GST classification. The petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
