Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The HC held that the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence are 'proper officers' u/s 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 and competent to initiate proceedings and issue show cause notices for recovery of duty. Relying on the SC's observation in Commissioner of Customs, the HC concluded that the DRI officers were duly appointed as customs officers through notifications issued by the Ministry of Finance. Consequently, the seizure proceedings initiated by the appellants were justified. The appeal was allowed.
The HC held that the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence are 'proper officers' u/s 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 and competent to initiate proceedings and issue show cause notices for recovery of duty. Relying on the SC's observation in Commissioner of Customs, the HC concluded that the DRI officers were duly appointed as customs officers through notifications issued by the Ministry of Finance. Consequently, the seizure proceedings initiated by the appellants were justified. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
