Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT upheld the attachment of properties acquired prior to the commission of the alleged crime. The proceeds of crime were siphoned off by diverting and layering, thus the property of equivalent value was attached under the second limb of the definition of "proceeds of crime." The provisional attachment order did not lapse due to the intervening Covid-19 period eliminated by the Apex Court. The properties were linked to the proceeds of crime through financial transactions and layering. The scheduled offence was valid as the relevant date was when the tainted property was projected as untainted in 2012, leading to the recording of the money laundering offence. The appeals were dismissed.
The AT upheld the attachment of properties acquired prior to the commission of the alleged crime. The proceeds of crime were siphoned off by diverting and layering, thus the property of equivalent value was attached under the second limb of the definition of "proceeds of crime." The provisional attachment order did not lapse due to the intervening Covid-19 period eliminated by the Apex Court. The properties were linked to the proceeds of crime through financial transactions and layering. The scheduled offence was valid as the relevant date was when the tainted property was projected as untainted in 2012, leading to the recording of the money laundering offence. The appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
