Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC held that issuance of Summary of Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01 without a proper Show Cause Notice u/s 73 of CGST/SGST Act is invalid. Proper Show Cause Notice and Statement of tax determination u/s 73(1) and 73(3) are mandatory requirements, in addition to Summary u/r 142. Impugned order passed without issuing proper Show Cause Notice is contrary to Section 73 and Rule 142(1)(a). HC further held that not granting opportunity of hearing despite request violates Section 75(4) safeguarding assessee's right. Show Cause Notice, Statement and Order require authentication u/r 26(3). Impugned order quashed for violating statutory provisions.
HC held that issuance of Summary of Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01 without a proper Show Cause Notice u/s 73 of CGST/SGST Act is invalid. Proper Show Cause Notice and Statement of tax determination u/s 73(1) and 73(3) are mandatory requirements, in addition to Summary u/r 142. Impugned order passed without issuing proper Show Cause Notice is contrary to Section 73 and Rule 142(1)(a). HC further held that not granting opportunity of hearing despite request violates Section 75(4) safeguarding assessee's right. Show Cause Notice, Statement and Order require authentication u/r 26(3). Impugned order quashed for violating statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
