Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to defend itself by filing objections and submitting documents before the assessing officer/competent authority, as the order imposing tax liability was passed ex parte without proper service of show cause notice under GST Act. The principle of audi alteram partem mandates that no one should be condemned unheard, and procedural lapses shouldn't deprive parties of their right to appeal. The impugned order was treated as a show cause notice to enable petitioner to file reply.
The HC held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to defend itself by filing objections and submitting documents before the assessing officer/competent authority, as the order imposing tax liability was passed ex parte without proper service of show cause notice under GST Act. The principle of audi alteram partem mandates that no one should be condemned unheard, and procedural lapses shouldn't deprive parties of their right to appeal. The impugned order was treated as a show cause notice to enable petitioner to file reply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.