Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
The HC held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to defend itself by filing objections and submitting documents before the assessing officer/competent authority, as the order imposing tax liability was passed ex parte without proper service of show cause notice under GST Act. The principle of audi alteram partem mandates that no one should be condemned unheard, and procedural lapses shouldn't deprive parties of their right to appeal. The impugned order was treated as a show cause notice to enable petitioner to file reply.
The HC held that the petitioner should be given an opportunity to defend itself by filing objections and submitting documents before the assessing officer/competent authority, as the order imposing tax liability was passed ex parte without proper service of show cause notice under GST Act. The principle of audi alteram partem mandates that no one should be condemned unheard, and procedural lapses shouldn't deprive parties of their right to appeal. The impugned order was treated as a show cause notice to enable petitioner to file reply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.