Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC quashed the impugned order for violating principles of natural justice by not providing proper show cause notice and opportunity of hearing u/ss 73 and 75(4) of CGST/AGST Act. It held that summary of show cause notice without mentioning reasons cannot initiate proceedings u/s 73. The attachment containing tax determination u/s 73(3) cannot substitute show cause notice under 73(1). Proper show cause notice with reasons, statement under 73(3), and final order must be issued and digitally signed as per Rule 26(3). The HC granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings.
The HC quashed the impugned order for violating principles of natural justice by not providing proper show cause notice and opportunity of hearing u/ss 73 and 75(4) of CGST/AGST Act. It held that summary of show cause notice without mentioning reasons cannot initiate proceedings u/s 73. The attachment containing tax determination u/s 73(3) cannot substitute show cause notice under 73(1). Proper show cause notice with reasons, statement under 73(3), and final order must be issued and digitally signed as per Rule 26(3). The HC granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.