Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
The HC quashed the impugned order for violating principles of natural justice by not providing proper show cause notice and opportunity of hearing u/ss 73 and 75(4) of CGST/AGST Act. It held that summary of show cause notice without mentioning reasons cannot initiate proceedings u/s 73. The attachment containing tax determination u/s 73(3) cannot substitute show cause notice under 73(1). Proper show cause notice with reasons, statement under 73(3), and final order must be issued and digitally signed as per Rule 26(3). The HC granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings.
The HC quashed the impugned order for violating principles of natural justice by not providing proper show cause notice and opportunity of hearing u/ss 73 and 75(4) of CGST/AGST Act. It held that summary of show cause notice without mentioning reasons cannot initiate proceedings u/s 73. The attachment containing tax determination u/s 73(3) cannot substitute show cause notice under 73(1). Proper show cause notice with reasons, statement under 73(3), and final order must be issued and digitally signed as per Rule 26(3). The HC granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.