Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
The HC held that the petitioner's request for indulgence need not be granted as the communication dated 12.11.2024 merely afforded an opportunity of hearing after the respondents notified discrepancies. The petitioner can respond to the discrepancies, including contentions u/s 67(1) of the KGST Act raised in the writ petition.
The HC held that the petitioner's request for indulgence need not be granted as the communication dated 12.11.2024 merely afforded an opportunity of hearing after the respondents notified discrepancies. The petitioner can respond to the discrepancies, including contentions u/s 67(1) of the KGST Act raised in the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.