Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 as the assessee had not disclosed a savings bank account with cash deposits of Rs. 13,20,535, providing prima facie reason. 25% of the cash deposits were treated as the assessee's income in absence of evidence for source. The CIT(A)'s estimation of 8% profit on turnover was upheld as the assessee did not disclose all credit entries. Penalty u/s 271B for failure to get accounts audited was upheld as the assessee could not establish reasonable cause, having shown lower turnover to avoid audit.
The ITAT upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 as the assessee had not disclosed a savings bank account with cash deposits of Rs. 13,20,535, providing prima facie reason. 25% of the cash deposits were treated as the assessee's income in absence of evidence for source. The CIT(A)'s estimation of 8% profit on turnover was upheld as the assessee did not disclose all credit entries. Penalty u/s 271B for failure to get accounts audited was upheld as the assessee could not establish reasonable cause, having shown lower turnover to avoid audit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.