Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the petitioner's exported car seat covers manufactured by it fall under HS Code 87089900 and are eligible for benefits claimed under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS). Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Mehra Brothers V. Joint Commercial Officer, the HC observed that car seat covers are accessories to motor vehicles, irrespective of being made of textile fabric. Consequently, the orders denying MEIS benefits to the petitioner were set aside.
The HC held that the petitioner's exported car seat covers manufactured by it fall under HS Code 87089900 and are eligible for benefits claimed under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS). Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Mehra Brothers V. Joint Commercial Officer, the HC observed that car seat covers are accessories to motor vehicles, irrespective of being made of textile fabric. Consequently, the orders denying MEIS benefits to the petitioner were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.