Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The NFRA held that the Auditors were grossly negligent and failed to exercise due diligence in the audit of a public interest entity, amounting to professional misconduct u/s 132(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. Monetary penalties were imposed - Rs. 2 crore on the Audit Firm, Rs. 10 lakhs on CA A.B. Jani who was also debarred for 5 years, and Rs. 5 lakhs on CA Rakesh Sharma who was debarred for 3 years from undertaking audits of companies.
The NFRA held that the Auditors were grossly negligent and failed to exercise due diligence in the audit of a public interest entity, amounting to professional misconduct u/s 132(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. Monetary penalties were imposed - Rs. 2 crore on the Audit Firm, Rs. 10 lakhs on CA A.B. Jani who was also debarred for 5 years, and Rs. 5 lakhs on CA Rakesh Sharma who was debarred for 3 years from undertaking audits of companies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.