Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The HC held that initiating proceedings against the petitioner alleging violation of Section 6(3)(b) of FEMA Act in 2021 was without jurisdiction. Section 6(3)(b) stood omitted by the Finance Act, 2015, notified on 15.10.2019. The complaint against the petitioner was filed on 25.10.2019 and show cause notice issued on 25.02.2020, after the omission took effect. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act regarding repeals was not applicable as the present case involved omission. The HC allowed the writ petition.
The HC held that initiating proceedings against the petitioner alleging violation of Section 6(3)(b) of FEMA Act in 2021 was without jurisdiction. Section 6(3)(b) stood omitted by the Finance Act, 2015, notified on 15.10.2019. The complaint against the petitioner was filed on 25.10.2019 and show cause notice issued on 25.02.2020, after the omission took effect. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act regarding repeals was not applicable as the present case involved omission. The HC allowed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
