Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The HC quashed the impugned adjudication order u/s 73 dated 28.12.2023 issued by respondent No.1 for violating principles of natural justice. No personal hearing was granted to the petitioner and the Show Cause Notice dated 13.12.2023 was not served properly. The matter was remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. The respondents were directed to refund the amount recovered from the petitioner on 11.03.2024 prior to 27.03.2024, being contrary to Section 78 of the KGST Act. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC quashed the impugned adjudication order u/s 73 dated 28.12.2023 issued by respondent No.1 for violating principles of natural justice. No personal hearing was granted to the petitioner and the Show Cause Notice dated 13.12.2023 was not served properly. The matter was remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. The respondents were directed to refund the amount recovered from the petitioner on 11.03.2024 prior to 27.03.2024, being contrary to Section 78 of the KGST Act. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
