Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the impugned adjudication order u/s 73 dated 28.12.2023 issued by respondent No.1 for violating principles of natural justice. No personal hearing was granted to the petitioner and the Show Cause Notice dated 13.12.2023 was not served properly. The matter was remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. The respondents were directed to refund the amount recovered from the petitioner on 11.03.2024 prior to 27.03.2024, being contrary to Section 78 of the KGST Act. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC quashed the impugned adjudication order u/s 73 dated 28.12.2023 issued by respondent No.1 for violating principles of natural justice. No personal hearing was granted to the petitioner and the Show Cause Notice dated 13.12.2023 was not served properly. The matter was remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. The respondents were directed to refund the amount recovered from the petitioner on 11.03.2024 prior to 27.03.2024, being contrary to Section 78 of the KGST Act. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
