Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the impugned adjudication order u/s 73 dated 28.12.2023 issued by respondent No.1 for violating principles of natural justice. No personal hearing was granted to the petitioner and the Show Cause Notice dated 13.12.2023 was not served properly. The matter was remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. The respondents were directed to refund the amount recovered from the petitioner on 11.03.2024 prior to 27.03.2024, being contrary to Section 78 of the KGST Act. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC quashed the impugned adjudication order u/s 73 dated 28.12.2023 issued by respondent No.1 for violating principles of natural justice. No personal hearing was granted to the petitioner and the Show Cause Notice dated 13.12.2023 was not served properly. The matter was remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law. The respondents were directed to refund the amount recovered from the petitioner on 11.03.2024 prior to 27.03.2024, being contrary to Section 78 of the KGST Act. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
