Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction u/s 254(2) to set aside the additions made by the AO regarding delayed payment of statutory dues like PF and ESIC amounts. This view was contrary to the SC's decision in Checkmate Services Pvt Ltd, which was rendered after the Tribunal's order. The HC agreed with the Tribunal's decision in ANI Integrated Services Ltd, which rejected the Revenue's application seeking rectification in light of Checkmate Services Pvt Ltd, considering the limited jurisdiction u/s 254(2) and Beghar Foundation.
The HC held that the Tribunal erred in exercising jurisdiction u/s 254(2) to set aside the additions made by the AO regarding delayed payment of statutory dues like PF and ESIC amounts. This view was contrary to the SC's decision in Checkmate Services Pvt Ltd, which was rendered after the Tribunal's order. The HC agreed with the Tribunal's decision in ANI Integrated Services Ltd, which rejected the Revenue's application seeking rectification in light of Checkmate Services Pvt Ltd, considering the limited jurisdiction u/s 254(2) and Beghar Foundation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
