Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The HC dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner, a government company, against compulsory selection of its return for scrutiny by the Assessing Officer. The HC held that the CBDT guidelines for compulsory scrutiny did not preclude random selection by the AO. It rejected the contention of violation of natural justice, as the petitioner did not seek personal hearing while filing online reply. The HC found no reason to interfere under Article 226.
The HC dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner, a government company, against compulsory selection of its return for scrutiny by the Assessing Officer. The HC held that the CBDT guidelines for compulsory scrutiny did not preclude random selection by the AO. It rejected the contention of violation of natural justice, as the petitioner did not seek personal hearing while filing online reply. The HC found no reason to interfere under Article 226.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
