Charitable institution cannot lose exemption merely because some activities incidentally benefit a religious community; retrospective registration can...
The HC dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner, a government company, against compulsory selection of its return for scrutiny by the Assessing Officer. The HC held that the CBDT guidelines for compulsory scrutiny did not preclude random selection by the AO. It rejected the contention of violation of natural justice, as the petitioner did not seek personal hearing while filing online reply. The HC found no reason to interfere under Article 226.
The HC dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner, a government company, against compulsory selection of its return for scrutiny by the Assessing Officer. The HC held that the CBDT guidelines for compulsory scrutiny did not preclude random selection by the AO. It rejected the contention of violation of natural justice, as the petitioner did not seek personal hearing while filing online reply. The HC found no reason to interfere under Article 226.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
