Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
The ITAT held that the AO failed to conclusively establish that the investing companies were non-existent to invoke Section 68 for addition of share capital. Regarding Section 56(2)(viib) addition for share premium, the ITAT ruled that when an unquoted company opts for the Discounted Cash Flow valuation method u/r 11UA(2)(b), the AO cannot disregard it and substitute with another method, even if discrepancies exist in the assessee's workings. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT held that the AO failed to conclusively establish that the investing companies were non-existent to invoke Section 68 for addition of share capital. Regarding Section 56(2)(viib) addition for share premium, the ITAT ruled that when an unquoted company opts for the Discounted Cash Flow valuation method u/r 11UA(2)(b), the AO cannot disregard it and substitute with another method, even if discrepancies exist in the assessee's workings. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
