Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The HC held that the show cause notice u/s 18 was valid, but set aside the notice u/s 28(4) as authorities failed to conduct provisional assessment before issuance. The petitioner was granted six weeks to reply to the Section 18 notice.
The HC held that the show cause notice u/s 18 was valid, but set aside the notice u/s 28(4) as authorities failed to conduct provisional assessment before issuance. The petitioner was granted six weeks to reply to the Section 18 notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.