Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
661 to 680 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The unpaid seller's application for re-exporting goods was accepted; no contravention under the Customs Act, 1962 was committed. While redemption fine is not payable for re-exported goods as per Supreme Court's judgment, considering the facts, redemption fine is reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/-. However, the penalty is upheld. Appeal partly allowed by CESTAT.
The unpaid seller's application for re-exporting goods was accepted; no contravention under the Customs Act, 1962 was committed. While redemption fine is not payable for re-exported goods as per Supreme Court's judgment, considering the facts, redemption fine is reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/-. However, the penalty is upheld. Appeal partly allowed by CESTAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.