Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The unpaid seller's application for re-exporting goods was accepted; no contravention under the Customs Act, 1962 was committed. While redemption fine is not payable for re-exported goods as per Supreme Court's judgment, considering the facts, redemption fine is reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/-. However, the penalty is upheld. Appeal partly allowed by CESTAT.
The unpaid seller's application for re-exporting goods was accepted; no contravention under the Customs Act, 1962 was committed. While redemption fine is not payable for re-exported goods as per Supreme Court's judgment, considering the facts, redemption fine is reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/-. However, the penalty is upheld. Appeal partly allowed by CESTAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.