Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT upheld FMC's jurisdiction to conduct inquiry into affairs of NMCE and its key management personnel to protect investors' interests. It found payment of Rs. 28.8 crore by NMCE to ATSPL for software development bogus, amounting to embezzlement. Allotment of NMCE shares to appellant No. 2 without following due process was held illegal. Appointment of 144 consultants without due diligence and misappropriation of NMCE funds of over Rs. 60 lakh for personal expenses by appellant No. 1 and family were also upheld as irregularities. The appeals were dismissed.
The AT upheld FMC's jurisdiction to conduct inquiry into affairs of NMCE and its key management personnel to protect investors' interests. It found payment of Rs. 28.8 crore by NMCE to ATSPL for software development bogus, amounting to embezzlement. Allotment of NMCE shares to appellant No. 2 without following due process was held illegal. Appointment of 144 consultants without due diligence and misappropriation of NMCE funds of over Rs. 60 lakh for personal expenses by appellant No. 1 and family were also upheld as irregularities. The appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.