Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT upheld FMC's jurisdiction to conduct inquiry into affairs of NMCE and its key management personnel to protect investors' interests. It found payment of Rs. 28.8 crore by NMCE to ATSPL for software development bogus, amounting to embezzlement. Allotment of NMCE shares to appellant No. 2 without following due process was held illegal. Appointment of 144 consultants without due diligence and misappropriation of NMCE funds of over Rs. 60 lakh for personal expenses by appellant No. 1 and family were also upheld as irregularities. The appeals were dismissed.
The AT upheld FMC's jurisdiction to conduct inquiry into affairs of NMCE and its key management personnel to protect investors' interests. It found payment of Rs. 28.8 crore by NMCE to ATSPL for software development bogus, amounting to embezzlement. Allotment of NMCE shares to appellant No. 2 without following due process was held illegal. Appointment of 144 consultants without due diligence and misappropriation of NMCE funds of over Rs. 60 lakh for personal expenses by appellant No. 1 and family were also upheld as irregularities. The appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
