Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The AT upheld FMC's jurisdiction to conduct inquiry into affairs of NMCE and its key management personnel to protect investors' interests. It found payment of Rs. 28.8 crore by NMCE to ATSPL for software development bogus, amounting to embezzlement. Allotment of NMCE shares to appellant No. 2 without following due process was held illegal. Appointment of 144 consultants without due diligence and misappropriation of NMCE funds of over Rs. 60 lakh for personal expenses by appellant No. 1 and family were also upheld as irregularities. The appeals were dismissed.
The AT upheld FMC's jurisdiction to conduct inquiry into affairs of NMCE and its key management personnel to protect investors' interests. It found payment of Rs. 28.8 crore by NMCE to ATSPL for software development bogus, amounting to embezzlement. Allotment of NMCE shares to appellant No. 2 without following due process was held illegal. Appointment of 144 consultants without due diligence and misappropriation of NMCE funds of over Rs. 60 lakh for personal expenses by appellant No. 1 and family were also upheld as irregularities. The appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.