Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
The HC held that the petitioner is a bona fide purchaser who acquired the property before the predicate offence was registered. A bona fide purchaser who acquires property prior to any predicate offence cannot be subjected to proceedings under the PMLA without evidence of conspiracy or direct involvement. The impugned proceedings against the petitioner were held unsustainable in the peculiar facts of the case. The petition was allowed.
The HC held that the petitioner is a bona fide purchaser who acquired the property before the predicate offence was registered. A bona fide purchaser who acquires property prior to any predicate offence cannot be subjected to proceedings under the PMLA without evidence of conspiracy or direct involvement. The impugned proceedings against the petitioner were held unsustainable in the peculiar facts of the case. The petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.