Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Appellant's goods "Siapton 10L and Isabion" correctly classifiable as fertilizer under CETA 3101 00 99, not as Plant Growth Regulator under CETA 3808 93 40 as claimed by Department. Larger Bench of CESTAT held plant growth promoters cannot be equated with plant growth regulators which inhibit, promote or alter physiological processes. Impugned orders set aside. Appeals allowed.
Appellant's goods "Siapton 10L and Isabion" correctly classifiable as fertilizer under CETA 3101 00 99, not as Plant Growth Regulator under CETA 3808 93 40 as claimed by Department. Larger Bench of CESTAT held plant growth promoters cannot be equated with plant growth regulators which inhibit, promote or alter physiological processes. Impugned orders set aside. Appeals allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.