Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Appellant's goods "Siapton 10L and Isabion" correctly classifiable as fertilizer under CETA 3101 00 99, not as Plant Growth Regulator under CETA 3808 93 40 as claimed by Department. Larger Bench of CESTAT held plant growth promoters cannot be equated with plant growth regulators which inhibit, promote or alter physiological processes. Impugned orders set aside. Appeals allowed.
Appellant's goods "Siapton 10L and Isabion" correctly classifiable as fertilizer under CETA 3101 00 99, not as Plant Growth Regulator under CETA 3808 93 40 as claimed by Department. Larger Bench of CESTAT held plant growth promoters cannot be equated with plant growth regulators which inhibit, promote or alter physiological processes. Impugned orders set aside. Appeals allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.