Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Appellant's goods "Siapton 10L and Isabion" correctly classifiable as fertilizer under CETA 3101 00 99, not as Plant Growth Regulator under CETA 3808 93 40 as claimed by Department. Larger Bench of CESTAT held plant growth promoters cannot be equated with plant growth regulators which inhibit, promote or alter physiological processes. Impugned orders set aside. Appeals allowed.
Appellant's goods "Siapton 10L and Isabion" correctly classifiable as fertilizer under CETA 3101 00 99, not as Plant Growth Regulator under CETA 3808 93 40 as claimed by Department. Larger Bench of CESTAT held plant growth promoters cannot be equated with plant growth regulators which inhibit, promote or alter physiological processes. Impugned orders set aside. Appeals allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.